The World Wide Web was an enormous step for
mankind, a step not seen since Neil Armstrong sullied the surface of
the moon. The idea behind the WWW came across as a veritable
information highway where documents, data and info could be rapidly
sent and accessed by millions the world over. The potential behind the
web is enormous and even now the scope is not fully utilized. The
possibilities for growth, for extended usage, are available and
enormous yet the system is stagnating and it is very possible that
people will soon turn away. The average person seeking information may
well return to old-fashioned libraries and the good old book to find
the information that they require if the face and image of the WWW is
not altered very soon and in-line with customer demand.
The ability of any user to gain information from
the Internet is enormous, simple and with positive results. But the
information received is increasingly becoming that which a paying body
prescribes and thus is advertisement biased or pointed towards the end
purchase of a product. Hotels advertise a city or holiday resort with
the point of view of potential tourists coming to stay. A detailed
description of moon cakes in Taiwan although complete and detailed
would certainly be with aim to make people buy some from the store
hosting the website involved.
Initially the Internet was heralded as a one-stop
point for gaining any type or form of information with the click of the
mouse. This is certainly true except with regard to loose information
that has no affiliation towards an end purchase or a users change of
heart. Certainly this type of information is available and millions of
websites exist but unless a user has prior information on how to access
this site then the chance of it being found amongst the masses is
minimal. Most web users find or locate information by using a search
engine. Most web users input their request and wait for results to come
up as prescribed and ordered by the search engine system. If for
example a request was entered for “travel tales on the sea” many,
possibly thousands of choices will appear in return. Number one in the
pole position will probably be Amazon.com who feels certain that
anybody looking for a story would probably find it amongst their
collection – naturally obtainable at a price. The next on the list
might be Ebay who feel that certain travel products might appease the
searcher or it might be goarticles.com an articles selling service who
would assume that travel tales of the sea would be somebody looking to
buy such from them and for their own use.
Certainly each and every result that is produced
on the first page would point the user towards large companies who are
selling an item of one sort or another. The user though may in fact
just want to read some Travel Tales of the Sea without having to fork
out cash or to issue his/her credit card information over the Internet.
In the bowels of the search results in pages that
are covered in dust will reside some very comprehensive and useful
websites, eg: http://www.seadolby.com
a website that is filled with free and in-depth Travel Tales of the
Sea. The possibility of any user keeping interest long enough to get to
this web site listing is minimal and long before it is reached the user
has either fallen asleep or entered another search on a different note.
In short the average user does not get past the first page of a search
engines results and probably not past the first three that come up:
e.g. amazon.com, ebay.com and goarticles.com
Although not-for-profit informational web sites
are many and filled with amazing and detailed info these sites ability
to gain attention on the world stage is difficult unless money is
poured in to boost their ratings and rank positions on the search
engine results. Nowadays many search engines have entered the
pay-per-click arena with companies putting forward money to buy
keywords that will most likely be used to boost their website. Some
company buys the word “Travel” and this word is then basically lost
forever to the lone free-for-all info site who cannot afford to pay
money to boost their popularity.
The art of advertising and paying for positions on
search engines is only available to the sites that can afford the
exorbitant fees. Should a lone site owner who has built his site-up
decide to fork out of his own pocket the money to boost his ratings
this will only be achieved on one or two search engines or directories
and the amount required to compete with the mega-sites is far beyond
any hobbyist can afford. Naturally the ability to submit ones site on
free inclusion pages and directories is available but as the webmaster
and author behind Seamania found out, so much energy and time is spent
on advancing the ratings of his site that not enough time is given to
the writing of travel tales of the sea, which of course is the basis
and sole point behind the website in the first place.
Large for profit websites can afford to hire
web-orientated staff to control, advertise and spend time on boosting
the rankings of their particular website. Single owner for profit
websites can afford to pay marketing specialists and to buy keywords at
exorbitant rates. The lone not-for-profit website owner can either
spend all day and all week controlling and submitting his site to the
thousands of ever changing search engines and directories and suffer
from a serious loss of updated content on his/her website or place
emphasis on building up content and never have a visitor to his portal.
Many other factors go towards reducing the
effectiveness of the individual website than just search result
rankings. Many single website owners operate outdated and very slow
computers, use old or outdated software and only perform on odd
occasions when not playing with their children or busy at work. Many
other free info sites have found that subscribing to some lists to
boost their rankings has in-fact reduced them to near invisibility.
Google and now other search engines condemn sites for using link pages
that they themselves do not agree with, so by simply subscribing or
joining one of these sites Google may drop a future crawl of the
website involved. It is also impossible for the lone not-for-profit
website to keep up with ever changing trends and policies. Where
payment is made for a lifetimes inclusion in a search engine, the next
year may see the demise of this particular engine or its partnering up
with another – thus the lifetimes inclusion becomes null and void and
to prevent being dropped from the listings another fee is required –
read the small print!
Other means to increase visibility is often
initiated by offering advertising space to companies like Google,
Barnes and Noble or other directories or affiliates. This can result in
a slight income for websites (The Seamania website made 40US dollars
over the last three months) but never enough to afford placement on
search engine results or to purchase keywords. It is also against the
grain for many free-info website owners to have to place advertising on
their websites as not only is it taking up valuable space it detracts
and reduces the free effect the content within. Furthermore should a
website choose one companies advertising it may boost their rankings
within one search engine but equally so reduce it in another’s e.g.
allowing Google advertising space on an index page may increase the
page rank in Google but seriously reduce it in Yahoos search results
and possible exclusion from their Yahoo Directory.
>From the point of view of an Internet User
in search of free and not-for-profit biased information he/she does not
want to see endless sites where a visa card is required to proceed
further. It would be very nice to see the advancement of such
directories like Zeal.com who divide their listings into those for
profit and those who generally provide valuable and non-profit
orientated formation. Naturally the question arises as to how such a
search engine would manage to cover the costs of these listings but
generally with the amount of people available who regard the Internet
as a toy and a hobby projects such as Editor of a category volunteers
should not be hard to recruit. The other way would be to have search
engines run and operated by governments like public libraries are or
built and operated by universities as part of study programs –
something practical for students to involve themselves with.
Directories abound whose content is managed by
volunteers, the Open Directory Project being the most famous. But sites
such as Seamania have found to their detriment that trying to get
noticed in amongst the debris found in these directories is not easy.
Seamania was originally listed as a Personal website in the boating
category but over time the emphasis and content of the website has
evolved to become a general travel website. It has though proved
impossible to change the location of the site in the Dmoz directory to
a travel listing rather than a boating listing.
If at all possible and to prevent users who are
sick of being asked for their credit card information or being given 30
different porn sites upon entering Travel Tales of the Sea into a
search engine, it would be nice to see a shift in emphasis in the way
that the search engines operate their listings.
Certainly the idea of switching on a computer and
being faced with two choices, one for sites that are-for-profit and one
that points towards not-for-profit sites would be a dream come true. To
enter in a search request and to not find amazon.com or ebay.com in the
first few results would put cheer to any searchers hopes of finding
what he wants. And maybe in this way a true exchange of information may
be facilitated and the mass exodus of searchers back to the public
library for information may be halted.
About The Author
Ieuan Dolby - Author and Webmaster of Seamania. As
a Chief Engineer in the Merchant Navy he has sailed the world for
fifteen years. Now living in Taiwan he writes about cultures across the
globe and life as he sees it.
seadolby.com
ieuandolby@seadolby.com